Where Literature Meets Scripture: The Contemplative Preaching of Kim Ki-seok

A Preacher Who Is Also a Literary Critic

South Korean bibliographic databases like Kyobo Book Centre list Rev. Kim Ki-seok’s professional title not only as “pastor” but also as “literary critic.” This is not a cataloging error. It is the accumulated trace of a double vocation that Kim himself has cultivated across more than four decades of ministry.

A graduate of Methodist Theological University and its graduate school, Kim served as a chaplain at Ewha Girls’ High School and as a military chaplain before joining Cheongpa Methodist Church in Seoul as an associate pastor. Founded in 1908, Cheongpa is one of the oldest Methodist congregations in Korea, located in the Yongsan district. Kim became senior pastor in 1997 and retired in April 2024 after forty-three years of ordained ministry. His farewell sermon, titled “Now It Begins Again” (Mark 1:14–15), ended a long tenure with the language of a new departure — itself a fitting summary of the sensibility that animates his entire body of work.

Since retiring, he has continued to teach at preaching and writing seminars organized by the Korean Methodist Church’s publishing house, and he maintains a regular column in the Kyunghyang Shinmun, one of Korea’s major national newspapers.

Sermon Structure: Poetic, Open-Ended Narrative

Kim’s sermons are closer to meditative narrative than to three-point exposition or doctrinal exegesis. Rather than treating the biblical text as a destination to be argued toward, he uses it as a point of departure from which thought unfolds organically. He described his own process in an interview with Newsnjoy:

“The act of writing itself generates its own direction. Sometimes I end up somewhere entirely different from where I started.”

This is not simply a remark about the writing process; it describes a structural philosophy. Instead of presenting a conclusion and marshaling evidence to support it, Kim draws the congregation into a shared movement of thought — an inductive, open-ended form in which meaning emerges rather than arrives pre-packaged.

His endings tend to honor this logic as well. Rather than stamping a tidy application onto the congregation, he prefers to leave resonance and open questions. Biblical scholar Jeong Yong-seop, director of the Daegu Scripture Academy, captured this quality well: “I admire his effort to enter the depths of Scripture. He creates a space for readers to think.”

Language as Theological Discipline

For Kim, language is not a delivery mechanism but a theological task in its own right. In a Newsnjoy interview, he put it plainly:

“Language is the window through which we look out at the world. The more windows of language I have available to me, the more richly the world comes into view.”

This conviction shapes concrete practice. He keeps a notebook to collect unfamiliar Korean words, committing them to memory through repeated use. The cultivation of vocabulary is, for him, inseparable from the cultivation of theological perception — sharper language means sharper seeing.

The same conviction shapes his approach to Scripture. In an interview with the Kyunghyang Shinmun (2024), he explained how he reads the Bible through a poet’s lens:

“Just as a poet reveals non-ordinary meaning by rearranging ordinary language, Scripture catches and holds the most luminous moments within the transient flow of everyday time.”

He is equally explicit about the plurality of interpretation the text invites:

“Reading Scripture requires an imagination capable of entering a world of experience that has not yet been put into words. It does not offer a single correct answer — it opens toward many possibilities of meaning.”

Prof. Cha Jeong-sik of Hanjang Presbyterian University offered what may be the most precise summary of Kim’s stylistic achievement: “His intellectual acuity shines without staying confined to intellect; he draws out the cold depths of emotion without being trapped there; and he goes on to spread the wings of spirituality and soar.”

The Range of Reference: An Intellectual Pilgrimage

Where many Korean preachers anchor their sermons in original-language word studies, Kim tends to reach instead for the whole breadth of Eastern and Western cultural tradition. A single recorded sermon, “Three Reflections,” draws on Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence alongside the Jain concept of ahimsa, Albert Schweitzer’s “Reverence for Life,” and the prophetic interpretation of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel — alongside East Asian classical thought and modern literature.

The function of these references is not to supply historical background for the text. They serve as literary lenses — ways of illuminating which stratum of universal human experience a given passage is touching. Historical context, where it appears, tends to work as literary atmosphere rather than exegetical scaffolding.

His official author biography at Kyobo Book Centre articulates this balance well: “He moves freely across poetry and prose, modern literature and Eastern and Western classics, opening new layers of faith — while never remaining in ornate literary rhetoric but keeping both feet planted firmly in the reality of daily life.”

The Prophetic Strand

Kim’s literary interiority is matched by a distinct prophetic voice. During the period of the Gwanghwamun candlelight protests — the civic movement that led to the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye — he preached a consecutive sermon series on the Hebrew prophets, later published as Those Who Raided the Conscience: The Prophets and the Spirit of Our Time (Hanul, 2009).

In an interview with OhmyNews, he spoke directly about the Korean church and ecological responsibility:

“The reason the world condemns the Korean church is that it has mistaken a life consumed by desire for a life of faith.”

“A faith that takes no responsibility for the ecological crisis is not genuine faith.”

The thesis he once offered as a lecture title compresses his prophetic theology into a phrase: “The essence of holiness is entering the suffering of the other and remaining there.” Literary critic Kim Eung-gyo, a professor at Sookmyung Women’s University, was drawn precisely to this dimension: “I am drawn to the power with which he directs our attention to the prophetic boldness and the awakening of the spiritually depleted reality of the church today.”

That contemplative poetry and prophetic declaration coexist in the same preacher is significant. It suggests they are not competing impulses but expressions of a single sensibility — the capacity for deep responsiveness to suffering, and the determination to find words precise enough to carry it.

The Spirituality of the Everyday Pilgrim

One of the most revealing titles in Kim’s bibliography is the simple phrase Everyday Pilgrim (Ilsang Sunlyeja), the name of a devotional collection. It names a spiritual discipline: the practice of encountering transcendence not in dramatic episodes but in the texture of daily life.

He is known for riding public transit rather than keeping a car, collecting impressions on daily walks, and bringing the ordinary into the pulpit — the pumpkin vine on the veranda, the pepper seedlings in the garden. One review described his preaching as “a cool drink of water drawn from the everyday.” Readers of his written sermons have noted that the spoken recordings carry a particular warmth the page alone does not fully convey — a sign that his prose, however carefully crafted, retains something of the spoken word’s aliveness.

This everyday sensibility runs through his major works: the encyclopedic sermon collection The Lamp of the Word (Kkotjari, 2023), which gathers one sermon for each of the Bible’s sixty-six books; the spiritual autobiography The Language of Confession (Book Press, 2024), which distills forty-three years of theological reflection; and The Language of Wisdom (Book Press, 2025), a post-retirement essay commentary on Ecclesiastes.

What Preachers Can Learn

Several aspects of Kim Ki-seok’s approach are worth studying closely.

Language as a spiritual discipline. The practice of collecting unfamiliar words is not merely a writer’s habit. It reflects a conviction that the quality of one’s attention to language determines the quality of one’s theological perception. Expanding vocabulary and expanding the capacity to see are, in his model, the same activity.

The open-ended form. Structuring a sermon as an unfolding movement of thought — rather than as the delivery of pre-established conclusions — changes the congregation’s role from recipients to co-travelers. It makes space for the kind of discovery that feels owned rather than received.

Reference as illumination, not decoration. When Kim cites Heschel or Schweitzer, he is not name-dropping. He is reaching for the angle of light that makes a particular dimension of the text visible. The goal is not to impress but to see more clearly.

The discipline of noticing. Sermon material is not found only in commentaries. Kim’s practice of attentive daily observation — walks, transit rides, the garden — demonstrates that the raw material of preaching is everywhere, provided the preacher has trained the habit of noticing.

Kim Ki-seok’s preaching represents an unusual convergence: scholarly depth, literary imagination, and prophetic courage inhabiting a single voice. None of these can be acquired in isolation or in a hurry. They are the harvest of sustained attention — to Scripture, to language, and to the life that unfolds outside the study window.

Comments

Loading comments…

Leave a comment

Comments are reviewed before being published. Only your name and comment are stored — no personal data collected.

Submit comment