Matthew 9:9-13, 18-26 — Sermon Prep & Expository Preaching Guide
Scripture
Matthew 9:9-13, 18-26
Historical Background · Verse-by-Verse Commentary · Reception History
What is the historical and cultural background of Matthew 9:9-13, 18-26?
The passage unfolds in first-century Galilee, centered on Capernaum in particular. The call of Matthew (Levi), the meal with tax collectors and sinners, the raising of the ruler's dead daughter, and the healing of the woman with a hemorrhage all flow together as one. To understand these scenes, we must examine the social and economic structure of Galilee, the social standing of the tax collector's profession, the meaning of table fellowship, and Jewish customs surrounding purity law and illness.
The Economy of Galilee and Capernaum
In the first century, Galilee under the rule of Herod Antipas was a region undergoing rapid urbanization and commercialization. Capernaum, on the northwestern shore of the Sea of Galilee, was a hub of fishing and trade, situated on the route linking Tiberias and Bethsaida along the lakeshore. The lake's fishing industry was more than a means of subsistence; it was a pillar of the regional economy, extending into processing, transport, and taxation, and social-historical analysis has proposed that the fish trade was a major driver of Galilee's economic growth.[bg1] This commercial environment explains why the "tax booth" (τελώνιον, telōnion) in the passage existed at all. The booth where Matthew sat collected tolls and customs duties on passing goods and catches of fish, and it was natural for such a station to be set up at a transit junction like Capernaum.
The Social Standing of the Tax Collector
Tax collectors (τελώνης, telōnēs) were those entrusted with collecting the indirect taxes of the Roman and Herodian systems. Because they could pocket the difference by collecting more than the set amount, they were regarded as the very embodiment of exploitation, and for serving a foreign power they were treated as religiously unclean as well. In the Jewish society of the day, tax collectors were often classed alongside robbers and murderers and were excluded from the synagogue community. When the Pharisees demand in the passage, "Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?" (9:11), their objection assumes precisely this social and religious stigma. Jesus' act of calling Matthew to be a disciple and sitting at his table was a shocking choice that ran directly counter to the conventions of the time.
The Meaning of Table Fellowship
In the ancient Mediterranean world, sharing a meal was not merely a matter of food but a public declaration of social solidarity and acceptance. With whom you shared a table was precisely the question of whom you recognized as a peer, and so the boundaries of the table were the boundaries of the community. Placing the meal scene of the passage within the context of first-century Pharisaic debate brings into relief that, while wisdom tradition prescribed that the teacher of the law avoid fellowship with manifest sinners, opinion was in fact divided over how to treat sinners and tax collectors. Ottenheijm reads the meal of Matthew 9:10-13 not as a simple violation but as a "therapeutic device" that leads sinners toward restoration.[bg2] Just as a physician goes to the sick (9:12), Jesus made the table a channel for calling sinners.
Customs Surrounding Purity, Illness, and Death
The two events in the latter half of the passage lie on the boundary line of purity law. The woman with a hemorrhage was, under the discharge regulations of Leviticus, in a perpetually unclean state, and whatever she touched became unclean (the discharge regulations of Leviticus 15). For such a woman to touch the fringe of Jesus' garment amid the crowd was an act of desperate faith that braved a social taboo. Contact with a corpse, too, brought severe impurity (Numbers 19), so Jesus' act of taking the dead girl's hand (9:25) reverses the flow of purity. Unlike the usual case where impurity passes to the clean, with Jesus it is rather his power and purity that flow to the unclean. The mourning crowd and the flute players (9:23) are a window into first-century Jewish funeral customs, in which even wealthy households customarily hired professional mourners and flutists to express grief. When Jesus said, "This girl is not dead but asleep" (9:24), the people's mocking laughter shows that her death was accepted as an obvious reality.
The Background of Hosea 6:6
The words Jesus cites, "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice" (9:13), come from Hosea 6:6. This is not a declaration abolishing the sacrificial system itself but rather a prophetic critique of compassionless ritualism, applied to his own table fellowship. Matthew uses this Hosea citation once more in 12:7, and scholarship analyzes how this Old Testament citation plays a key role in the identity formation and Torah understanding of the Matthean community.[bg3] That is, the theological heart of the passage's background is that true obedience lies not in ritual precision but in the practice of mercy.
References
- Hakola, R., "The Production and Trade of Fish as Source of Economic Growth in the First-Century CE Galilee," *Novum Testamentum* 59 (2017): 111-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341561. *(based on the publicly available abstract)*
- Ottenheijm, E., "The Shared Meal—a Therapeutical Device: The Function and Meaning of Hosea 6:6 in Matthew 9.10-13," *Novum Testamentum* 53 (2011): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853610x493009. *(based on the publicly available abstract)*
- Viljoen, F. P., "Hosea 6:6 and identity formation in Matthew," *Acta Theologica* 34 (2014): 214-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v34i1.2607.
What does each verse of Matthew 9:9-13, 18-26 mean?
> This section synthesizes the methodologies of several commentary traditions with contemporary scholarly discussion to offer a detailed exegesis that illumines the meaning of each sense unit from multiple angles. Verses whose meaning runs together in a single breath are treated as groups, while the original language, grammar, theology, and application of each unit are examined in depth.
9:9 — The Call of Matthew Seated at the Tax Booth
Text: εἶδεν ἄνθρωπον καθήμενον ἐπὶ τὸ τελώνιον, Μαθθαῖον λεγόμενον, καὶ λέγει αὐτῷ· Ἀκολούθει μοι. καὶ ἀναστὰς ἠκολούθησεν αὐτῷ. Literal: He saw a man seated at the tax booth, called Matthew, and he says to him, "Follow me." And so he rose and followed him.
Original Language and Grammar: - εἶδεν (eiden): aorist active indicative 3sg — Jesus' gaze reaches Matthew first. That the initiative in the call rests with Jesus is marked by the very first verb of the narration. - Ἀκολούθει μοι (akolouthei moi): present imperative + dative personal pronoun — a command of continuity, "keep following." It is an invitation not to a one-time summons but to a lifetime of companionship. - ἀναστὰς ... ἠκολούθησεν (anastas ... ēkolouthēsen): aorist participle + aorist indicative — "he rose and followed." This shows that Matthew's response came at once and decisively.
Commentary: Jesus calls a man seated at the tax booth — the most socially despised of places. The language of the call is simple, but its weight is decisive. The present tense of the command (continuity) and the aorist of the response (once-for-all) interlock to bring out the decisiveness of the event, as Matthew springs up from the seat of his livelihood and steps onto a new road. The passage offers no psychological account of what Matthew saw that made him follow — the emphasis falls solely on Jesus' call and the obedience to it. Botha analyzes how Matthew's "follow me" (Ἀκολούθει μοι) and "come after me" (Δεῦτε ὀπίσω μου) are the language of a call carrying the power to transform a person fundamentally.[v1] The call does not ask about qualification, and the response settles accounts with the past.
Homiletical Implication: The call begins not with our qualifications but with his gaze. Like Matthew on that day at the tax booth, even the most despised of places can become the place where the call arrives.
---
9:10-11 — The Table with Sinners, the Pharisees' Objection
Text: πολλοὶ τελῶναι καὶ ἁμαρτωλοὶ ἐλθόντες συνανέκειντο τῷ Ἰησοῦ ... Διὰ τί μετὰ τῶν τελωνῶν καὶ ἁμαρτωλῶν ἐσθίει ὁ διδάσκαλος ὑμῶν; Literal: Many tax collectors and sinners came and were reclining at table with Jesus ... "Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?"
Original Language and Grammar: - συνανέκειντο (synanekeinto): imperfect indicative 3pl — "were reclining together." The imperfect tense paints the meal as an ongoing, sustained scene. The verb's prefix συν- ("together") emphasizes the intimacy of the fellowship. - ἁμαρτωλοὶ (hamartōloi): "sinners" — a social-religious category referring to those indifferent to keeping the law or engaged in an unclean profession. - Διὰ τί (dia ti): "why" — not a simple question but a rhetorical one loaded with accusation.
Commentary: The call of Matthew the tax collector leads at once into table fellowship. In the ancient world, where sharing a meal was a public declaration of accepting another as a peer, Jesus' sitting at one table with tax collectors and sinners is a powerful sign that he received them into the community. The Pharisees object to the disciples (not directly to Jesus), but their arrow is clearly aimed at Jesus. Ottenheijm reads this meal not as a simple breach of the law but as a "therapeutic table" that leads sinners toward restoration, noting that attitudes toward sinners in the first century were not uniform but contested.[v2] Jesus' table is an act of resolutely siding with mercy in the very midst of that debate.
References
- Botha, R., "The transformative power embedded in Δεῦτε ὀπίσω μου and Ἀκολούθει μοι," *HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies* 77 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6616.
- Ottenheijm, E., "The Shared Meal—a Therapeutical Device: The Function and Meaning of Hosea 6:6 in Matthew 9.10-13," *Novum Testamentum* 53 (2011): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853610x493009. *(based on the publicly available abstract)*
- Viljoen, F. P., "Hosea 6:6 and identity formation in Matthew," *Acta Theologica* 34 (2014): 214-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v34i1.2607.
- Jackson, G. S., "Enemies of Israel: Ruth and the Canaanite Woman," *HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies* 59 (2003): 779-792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v59i3.673.
댓글
댓글 남기기
작성한 댓글은 검토 후 공개됩니다. 이름과 댓글 내용만 저장되며 개인정보는 수집하지 않습니다.
댓글을 불러오는 중...