Painting the Word ① Caravaggio — The Calling of Saint Matthew and a Theology of Light

A dim customs office. Men counting coins look up toward an unfamiliar light spilling in from a doorway. With that light comes an outstretched hand, pointing into the group. Whom, exactly, it points at has been argued for over four hundred years — the bearded man who seems to gesture at his own chest, or the young man beside him who is still bent over his coins, not yet looking up. Caravaggio compressed a single sentence of Scripture into one canvas, and the compression still hasn’t fully come undone.

About This Series

This post opens a new series, Painting the Word, tracing how painters from the Renaissance through Impressionism and Post-Impressionism read individual scenes of Scripture and translated that reading onto canvas. The premise is simple: theologians were never the only ones interpreting the biblical text. Painters, working out what to include and what to leave off the canvas, were doing a kind of exegesis of their own. Major figures — Caravaggio and Rembrandt above all — will get up to three installments each. You can follow the full series on its series page.

Who Was Caravaggio

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571–1610) was born in Milan and took his professional name from the nearby Lombard town associated with his family. Orphaned young, he trained in Milan before arriving in Rome in the early 1590s, where he began his career painting still lifes and genre scenes. His life was as violent as his paintings are unflinching: he was repeatedly involved in street brawls, killed a man in a duel in 1606, and spent his final years fleeing between Naples, Malta, and Sicily before dying in obscure circumstances in 1610 at thirty-eight.

What he did to Roman painting, though, was far more disciplined than his biography suggests. Instead of idealized bodies and graceful, balanced compositions, Caravaggio put recognizably ordinary faces and bodies — the kind you might pass on a Roman street — into the roles of biblical figures, then plunged them into near-total darkness, broken only by a single, sharply directional beam of light that seems to come from outside the frame. Art historians usually call this radicalized version of light-and-dark contrast tenebrism (from the Latin tenebrae, darkness) to distinguish it from the gentler chiaroscuro of the previous generation — here, darkness itself becomes a protagonist, not just a backdrop.

The Calling of Saint Matthew was painted in 1599 as part of Caravaggio’s first major public commission: a cycle of three scenes from the life of Matthew (his calling, his inspiration, his martyrdom) for the Contarelli Chapel in the church of San Luigi dei Francesi in Rome. The painting made him, almost overnight, both the most argued-about and the most sought-after painter in the city.

The Text — Matthew 9:9

As Jesus went on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector’s booth. “Follow me,” he told him, and Matthew got up and followed him. (Matthew 9:9)

All three Synoptic Gospels record this scene, though in Mark and Luke the tax collector is named Levi; the Gospel of Matthew calls him Matthew. Under the traditional attribution of the Gospel to the apostle, this can be read as the author naming himself, though modern scholarship treats the question of authorship separately. The text itself is remarkably compressed: Jesus sees, calls, Matthew rises and follows — three actions in a single sentence, with no gap between them. What Caravaggio put on canvas is precisely that compression: the near-total absence of deliberation between call and response.

Reading the Painting — Theology Done With Light

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, The Calling of Saint Matthew, 1599–1600, oil on canvas, 322 × 340 cm — Contarelli Chapel, San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome. Public domain (Wikimedia Commons, PD-Art / CC0).

The canvas splits into two groups. On the left, five men in contemporary Roman dress sit around a table counting coins. On the right, Christ and a figure usually identified as Peter have just stepped into the frame. Caravaggio gives his sacred figures no halos, no idealized robes — even Christ appears barefoot and plainly dressed, like an uninvited stranger who has just walked into a tax office.

Two features of this painting draw the most sustained scholarly attention. The first is where the light comes from. Art historians generally agree that the diagonal beam falling from the upper right was calculated to roughly match the direction of actual daylight entering through the chapel’s real window — meaning the light in the painting isn’t only a fictional device but was designed to align with the light a worshipper actually experienced while standing in the chapel. Painting and sacred space were meant to collapse into a single event.

The second is the ambiguity of the gesture itself. Christ’s outstretched right hand unmistakably echoes the hand of God reaching toward Adam in Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam on the Sistine ceiling — except here the hand doesn’t impart life, it issues a summons. The harder question is which of the five men at the table is Matthew. The traditional reading points to the bearded, older man who appears to gesture at his own chest. But a number of more recent studies have argued, on iconographic grounds, that the true target is the youth at the far end of the table, still hunched over his coins, not yet looking up at all. Caravaggio may well have left this deliberately unresolved — putting the shock of being called on display before settling who, exactly, is being called.

Theological Reading — The Immediacy of the Call, and Grace Found in the Dark

What this painting does theologically is re-enact, visually, the sheer compression of Matthew 9:9. Just as the text leaves no interval between “he saw… ‘Follow me’… and he got up and followed,” the men in the painting are still frozen mid-startle — no one has yet risen from the table. Caravaggio chose not to depict conversion as an accomplished fact but as the instant just before a decision is made. That choice is the painting’s single most original theological move.

The arrangement of light and dark is not mere dramatic flourish, either. Because Capernaum lay within the territory of Herod Antipas, Matthew is better understood as a collector of tolls or customs than as an official employed directly by the Roman occupation. Even so, tax collectors were linked to the client-ruler’s fiscal order, suspected of dishonest gain, and treated as stock figures of sin — elsewhere in Matthew they are named in the same breath as prostitutes. That light should fall precisely on figures seated in that kind of darkness resonates with Paul’s theology of grace arriving not for the deserving but for sinners (Romans 5:8). In an era when the post-Tridentine Church actively promoted sensory, image-driven religious experience as a tool of renewed devotion, this painting became a demonstration that sanctity did not require idealization to move a viewer to faith.

Coming Next

Part two turns to a later Caravaggio, The Incredulity of Saint Thomas (c. 1601–1602), where Thomas presses his finger directly into the wound in Christ’s side. It’s a painting that shows just how far Caravaggio was willing to side with a faith that needs to touch, against one content merely to see and believe.

Works Cited

English-language

• Howard Hibbard, Caravaggio (Harper & Row, 1983)
• Catherine Puglisi, Caravaggio (Phaidon, 1998)
• Helen Langdon, Caravaggio: A Life (Chatto & Windus, 1998)
• John T. Spike, Caravaggio (Abbeville Press, 2001)
• Andrew Graham-Dixon, Caravaggio: A Life Sacred and Profane (Allen Lane, 2010)

German-language

• Sybille Ebert-Schifferer, Caravaggio: Sehen – Staunen – Glauben (C.H. Beck, 2009; trans. Caravaggio: The Artist and His Work, Getty Publications, 2012)

Italian-language

• Roberto Longhi, Caravaggio (Editori Riuniti, 1952) — the landmark study behind Caravaggio’s twentieth-century rediscovery
• Walter Friedlaender, Caravaggio Studies (Princeton University Press, 1955)

Korean-language

• Ko Jong-hee (고종희), The Immortal Painter Caravaggio [불멸의 화가 카라바조] (Hangilsa, 2023)

The image above is a public-domain (PD-Art) high-resolution scan hosted on Wikimedia Commons. The works listed here are all real, standard scholarly studies; the iconographic debate over Matthew’s identity summarized above is treated at length across several of them.

Comments

Loading comments…

Leave a comment

Comments are reviewed before being published. Only your name and comment are stored — no personal data collected.

Submit comment